Your remedy

Your job back or compensation?

You are deciding whether to ask for your job back or for money.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

Should you ask for reinstatement or compensation?

That depends on whether you would genuinely want to return to that workplace and whether it still feels realistic. Malaysian unfair dismissal law is built around reinstatement as the main remedy, with money following where it is not ordered.1

Reinstatement is not the only possible outcome, and it does not suit every situation. Many workers, especially after a hostile exit, prefer compensation.

Why do workers choose differently?

Some want the job back because the role mattered to them and the dismissal felt like a mistake. Others feel the trust needed to work together again is gone.

If compensation is the path, back wages, where awarded, are capped at 24 months for a confirmed employee and 12 months for a probationer.2 No answer is right for everyone.

How do you think through your own preference?

Write down honestly whether you would return if offered the chance. Consider what has changed since the dismissal, including your plans and any new opportunities.

Talk it through with a family member or trusted friend, because saying your reasoning aloud often shows which option you lean toward. You do not have to lock in your first instinct, since your view can change as more information arrives.

What should you do next?

Read about what compensation in lieu of reinstatement can look like so you can weigh both paths with real numbers. If you want a lawyer to act, an employment lawyer can frame your written representation around the outcome you want and pursue it if you have grounds.

If you are deciding between reinstatement and money, an independent employment lawyer can review your case and pursue the outcome you want if you have grounds.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.

Common questions

Do I have to choose between the two upfront?

You can state a preference in your written representation, but the court decides based on the facts of your case, not only on your first preference.

Why would someone choose money over their old job?

Trust may already be broken, or the workplace may feel hostile to return to. Some workers simply want to move forward from a job that ended badly.

Is getting your job back actually common?

Reinstatement is the main remedy the law is built around, but outcomes depend on the facts. Not every successful case ends in reinstatement, because the court weighs what is practical.

Can I change my mind partway through the process?

Think it through early, since your preference shapes how your representation is framed. If your thinking changes, tell your employment lawyer as soon as it does.

Sources

  1. The remedy the law frames for unfair dismissal is reinstatement, with money such as back wages or compensation following where reinstatement is not ordered. Mah Weng Kwai & Associates (accessed 2026-09-22)
  2. Back wages awarded for unfair dismissal are capped at 24 months for a confirmed employee and 12 months for a probationer. DNH (accessed 2026-09-22)

If you are deciding between reinstatement and money, an independent employment lawyer can review your case and pursue the outcome you want if you have grounds.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.