Poor performance dismissal

Myths about poor performance dismissal

Some beliefs about poor performance dismissal are wrong, and they stop people checking their options.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

Which myths get in the way of a fair read?

The most common myth is that a low rating settles the matter. The Industrial Court looks at the whole process, including whether standards were clear and warnings were genuine, not just the final number.1

Another is that you must first prove your own good performance. The burden sits with the employer, who has to show the reason was real and the process fair.2

What are the myths about PIPs and perfect records?

Some people assume that being placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) makes a later dismissal fair. A PIP whose targets keep shifting, or that offers little real support, tells a different story.

Another myth is that only a flawless work history supports a claim. Most real cases include some genuine performance concerns next to a process that still fell short of fair.

Can your employer dismiss you on the spot for low results?

No, poor results alone do not let an employer skip the steps. It is expected to set a clear standard, warn you, and give you time to improve before it dismisses you.

Keep any message that shows you were never told the standard.

How do you get past the myths?

Start with the facts of your own case, beginning with your dates on the 60-day deadline calculator. The page on dismissal for poor performance explains what a fair process looks like, so you can compare it with what happened.

If a conduct allegation is involved too, read myths about misconduct dismissal claims. When you are ready to file, the Section 20 representation page explains the step.

If you want a lawyer to act, an independent employment lawyer can look at your papers and take it forward if it holds up.

If you are seriously considering a claim over a poor performance dismissal, request lawyer contact first; only after an identified independent lawyer has contacted you and specifically requested the material, send your warnings and any improvement plan. An independent employment lawyer can tell you whether it is a case they can take on.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.

Common questions

Is it true that a low performance rating ends the discussion?

No. A rating is one piece of evidence, not the final word, and the Industrial Court looks at the whole process. Clear standards, real warnings and consistent treatment matter as much as the number.

Is it true I have to prove I performed well?

No, the opposite is closer to correct. Your employer has to prove the performance problem was real and that dismissing you over it was fair.

Is it true that being on a PIP means dismissal is inevitable?

No. A Performance Improvement Plan is meant to give you a genuine chance to improve. If targets kept shifting or support was missing, that pattern is worth raising.

Is it true a claim only works if I never made mistakes?

No. A claim asks whether the dismissal process was fair, not whether you were a perfect employee. Most real cases involve some genuine performance concerns alongside a flawed process.

Sources

  1. The burden of proving both the poor performance and the fairness of the dismissal process rests on the employer, not the employee, once a case reaches the Industrial Court Mah Weng Kwai & Associates (accessed 2026-09-22)
  2. An employee who believes a dismissal had no just cause or excuse can file a written representation to the Director General of Industrial Relations within 60 days of the dismissal Mah Weng Kwai & Associates (accessed 2026-09-22)

If you are seriously considering a claim over a poor performance dismissal, request lawyer contact first; only after an identified independent lawyer has contacted you and specifically requested the material, send your warnings and any improvement plan. An independent employment lawyer can tell you whether it is a case they can take on.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.