Common mistakes

Mistakes that weaken a forced resignation claim

A few quiet errors can weaken your case before it even starts.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

Waiting too long before resigning

The Bayer conditions ask whether you resigned because of the breach, and whether you acted within a reasonable time instead of accepting it.1 Staying for months without objecting can later be read as tolerating the situation. This is the classic constructive dismissal trap.

You do not have to resign at once. A long, unexplained delay is what hurts. If you need time, use it to document, not simply to wait.

Resigning before documenting anything

Leaving in the heat of the moment, with nothing written down, makes your case hard to rebuild. Memories fade, messages get deleted, and small details are easily lost.

A pause of a few days to gather evidence should not weaken a genuine case. It often strengthens it.

Writing a vague resignation letter

A letter that gives no reasons makes it harder to link your departure to the breach. Employers sometimes point to a polite, generic letter as proof that nothing serious happened.

State your specific reasons, even briefly. It protects you from that argument later.

Treating the deadline as flexible

The 60-day window from your resignation is fixed, not a rough guide.2 Assuming there is room to negotiate it is one of the costliest mistakes in this situation.

Treating every unpleasant moment as a breach

Not every disagreement, criticism or awkward meeting meets the contract test. Treating minor friction as a serious breach can make a strong case look weaker.

Focus your account on the events that actually changed your role, pay or working conditions. A lawyer can help you separate those from the rest.

What should you do this week?

Check where you stand with the deadline calculator, and read how to prepare your case before you take another step.

If you want to bring a claim, request lawyer contact with your location, relevant dates and a short summary of the steps taken so far. An independent lawyer can assess whether they can act and file a Section 20 representation for you if there are grounds.

If you have already taken steps after being forced out, an independent employment lawyer can review them and take the claim forward if you still have grounds.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.

Common questions

Is waiting too long before resigning a real risk?

Yes. Staying on for months after a breach without objecting can suggest you accepted it. Acting within a reasonable time affects how your case is read later.

Can resigning too quickly also be a mistake?

It can, if you leave before writing down what happened, or before the breach is clearly serious enough. A short pause to gather evidence should not weaken a genuine case.

Is it a mistake to resign without giving a reason?

A letter with no reason makes it harder to link your departure to the breach later. Stating your reasons clearly at the time strengthens that link.

What is the most common mistake people make with the deadline?

Assuming the 60-day window is flexible. It is fixed from your resignation date, and missing it usually closes the Section 20 route.

Sources

  1. Bayer (M) Sdn Bhd v Anwar Abd Rahim sets out four conditions for constructive dismissal: a breach of an essential term, that the breach was serious enough, that the employee resigned because of it, and that the employee did not delay before leaving. Thomas Philip (accessed 2026-09-22)
  2. An employee who believes they were dismissed without just cause or excuse may file a Section 20 representation with the Director General of Industrial Relations within 60 days of the dismissal. Mah Weng Kwai & Associates (accessed 2026-09-22)

If you have already taken steps after being forced out, an independent employment lawyer can review them and take the claim forward if you still have grounds.

For people seeking legal representation. For general information, please use our guides and tools.

First contact: general facts only, such as date, location, employment status and a short summary. Keep documents private until an identified independent lawyer contacts you and specifically requests them.